King County Courts Injustices Lives On

+

Tragic Court Story Of A Book Write in Seattle Washington Beverley Marley

King County Courts Injustices Lives On

By: gmfameSubscribe Channel: On the Scene Location: Seattle, Washington Friday, Mar 13 , 09 at 8:25 PM

Tags:

Book writer famed by the system
39 Comments

Tragic Court Story of a Book Write Out In Seattle Washington
Book writer out of Seattle, Washington “Beverly Marley” fundamental rights have been abused by the extremes power of the prosecutors in the Washington State Superior Court on 03,12,2009. As well as by an all white jury of her peers rendered a guilty verdict, to protect the prosecuting side from perjury. These parties have enacted unjust and unconstitutional laws, which eroded her fundamental rights and good name.
Mrs. Beverly Marley rights have been denied in the areas of “rules of evidence” and “due process”
Her witnesses were not giving the privilege to testify adequately by the courts.
Her public defender was render powerless to represent her case correctly.
Vital witness was not contacted on Ms. Beverly Marley’s behalf
Ms. Marley was found guilty in a court of law based on hears say and not evidence.
Ms. Beverly Marley is being sentence two weeks from 0312/2009 based on faulty hearsay and not law. Ms. Marley is dumb founded to the system because she has not committed any crimes to understand the system. She is a victim of a N85.
Book Title:

Father Who Forgot His Children : A True Story by Beverley J. Marley
Paperback

This story is inappropriate and should be flagged for moderation. Please choose from one of the following options:

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Tha Man says ... on Monday, Mar 30 at 6:24 PM

Alright Pouch!

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 4:24 PM

Further information has/being recovered that Ms. Marley was convicted falsely that will point out injustice. More legitimate eye witnesses and documents showing PS was in fact living with Ms. Marley and visited by nurses and Social workers 2005-2006

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 4:17 PM

It was illegal for Prosecutors to share private information to state witnesses as she did. Information pertaining to Ms. Marley at any point. Prosecutor was confronted on her actions by Public Defender. Prosecutor laughed and turned paper around.

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 4:12 PM

The Jury must ask themselves. Did they make the verdict based on on evidence and facts or out of pity for a disability? The disability was never to be mentioned to the jury. Prosecutor should have faced Contempt of Court to keep addressing to jurors

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 4:06 PM

accounts. Investigator made mistakes by take state works words at face value. Public Defender with no training or experience to fight the case. No other Defender would take the case and other PD's was inexperienced than Defender on case. (PD word)

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 3:59 PM

Prosecutor attended schools with Mr. Marley's daughter. Prosecutor claims that she did not. They are were acquaintance at many points. Public Defender states he had no idea how to handle the case. He believe she would be found innocent on all but 2.

Moore says ... on Wednesday, Mar 25 at 3:56 PM

Witnesses, documents, and evidence were not submitted the courts in support of Marley's. Social workers say they did not keep records, Public Defender never defended type of case and had no clue how, no subpoena's for all the above.

Moore says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 6:15 PM

To empower hearsay you must suppress evidence, documentation, and witness as if they did not exist and hope no one is smart enough to realize it. (Trying to protect the State from errors) It hard to fight back being locked away. CHANGELING go see it

Moore says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 6:05 PM

To answer your ? an innocent woman is found guilty for a crime she did not commit. Her Public defender fail to contact her witnesses and file documents giving to him to support her innocents. The case be came a "Dieing Declaration" empowering hearsay

Moore says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 6:00 PM

Dear Anonymous. I am not the most educated person on the map. However, I am a fighter against Unjust acts made against the innocents. That is why we need individual like you, with heart, and true, and to ad us with our English words and writing. TU

Anonymous says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 3:42 PM

this.

Anonymous says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 3:42 PM

What is N85? "These parties have enacted unjust and unconstitutional laws, which eroded her fundamental rights and good name." I would have been more moved had the big words been used properly. What is the injustice? I'm going to loose sleep over

Anonymous says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 3:40 PM

"Ms. Beverly Marley is being sentence two weeks from 0312/2009 based on faulty hearsay and not law. Ms. Marley is dumb founded to the system because she has not committed any crimes to understand the system. She is a victim of a N85."

I agree, says ... on Monday, Mar 23 at 3:40 PM

The writing here is so horrible that I couldn't follow. Am I too educated, on not enough? The use of their was wrong "thru out" wrong use. I din't get any of this. Who is PP? "Ms. Beverly Marley is being sentence two weeks from 0312/2009"

What? says ... on Friday, Mar 20 at 3:17 PM

So there is a book? I cannot understand what in the world this is all about. The original post or all of the comments. Why would you post this? What is your goal?

Moore says ... on Thursday, Mar 19 at 12:35 PM

Cathy, How can you see what is wrong with others English; if you can't see what is wrong in the system around you? If the world all spoke the same it would be a communist state. Is that what your revealing America is or headed? Our way or no way! War

Moore says ... on Thursday, Mar 19 at 12:25 PM

Untie is no different from aunt Content _People. It is the certified smart people like you that question and belittle others. The wise people understand different communication styles and writing formats. Small minds stay narrow. Eat C_P Eat.

Moore says ... on Thursday, Mar 19 at 12:13 PM

Individual such is Cathy states a really good point. She tells The Mind to go back to where he came from. Cathy the lower courts don't use actual laws; it uses Ordnance to target individuals. Cathy stupidly is an island packed like rats. No cheese!

Content_People says ... on Tuesday, Mar 17 at 12:50 PM

(Continued) What in the world does this sentence mean: "Who tried to have Federal Police kick out his untie out her own home"? In this case, what in the world is "untie"??? until? unit? Was someone tied up and then they "untie" him?

Content_People says ... on Tuesday, Mar 17 at 12:48 PM

To: "The Mind" You may have a point. However, if you are posting a blog in order to gain sympathy and support, it would be prudent to post in an order that most functioning adults in the US are able to read and understand.

Cathy says ... on Tuesday, Mar 17 at 9:38 AM

Dearest 'The Mind', please then, my friend, go back to wherever it is that you came from. I imagine you are in America by choice, as this is a free country. If you are so dissapointed in how US, and WA State laws are enforced, LEAVE! Thankyouverymuch

The Mind says ... on Monday, Mar 16 at 8:55 AM

Cultures speak different and robots speak the same to degrade humans life that know right from wrong. If speaking english is more greater than innocent people facing time and the guilty going free, I don't want any part of your english degrading.

The Mind says ... on Monday, Mar 16 at 8:44 AM

Smoking Cathy (maybe that is what your doing at this time?) Do u know how to speak American Law? Correct english does not work in the American courts. Is everyone to speak the W American way? Great AmeriNotzy! Black hidden codes in WA is real.

Cathy says ... on Sunday, Mar 15 at 2:47 PM

Do any of you people actually know how to use proper English? It looks like my eight year old typed all of these comments! Please tell me you are not American adults who have gone through our public school system. Please!

Moore says ... on Sunday, Mar 15 at 3:35 AM

Prior to 2005 - 2006 Smith lived with Marley. Her brother PJ lived with Miss. Johnson and my mother before he and his girlfriend was kicked out for scamming. Her brother J also was living with Miss. Johnson got kicked out for the same things. Havoc!

Moore says ... on Sunday, Mar 15 at 3:27 AM

Who really scammed state money of $ 8,765.32 for her developmentally delayed recipient niece? And is She really developmentally that she and her friend can't run a scam? She lived with her untie, her and D, filed fraudulent papers she live with D.

Moore says ... on Sunday, Mar 15 at 3:01 AM

I know Ms. Smith to be a liar and con, just as her brother. Who tried to have Federal Police kick out his untie out her own home, to take over with his girlfriend, when they came from St. Louis. By a false claim of DV. PJ and Ms. Smith are cons.

fb says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 10:15 PM

joyce says yeh wright how u know how much they say she claim for it doesn't say in the article and where you at her house are you a person of interest or do u know her whats up with that.

A.C says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 10:09 PM

Sorry Joyce, but your facts are wrong Marley did not claim for money in that period. Actually money was sent back by to the state for those months... you wish you knew but you have no idea. Proof of this fact was submitted in court. Where you jury?

T T says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:56 PM

At this point proper English dose not matter waterboard. Our system is slipping away from us. Joyce sound like a not to bright individual. It sounds like the witnesses from the prosecuting side got the money and file for more. Then covered their A's

The Mind says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:34 PM

There seems to be errors made if the story is article is factual. Errors are common in the state of Washington Courts. It is a fact that the court of Washington has breached contract to protect the people and has discharged the will to preform law.

T.R. says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:32 PM

Paula admitted she lied in to the courts. Paula did not move out until February 2006, I know this because i was there it was my step daughter and daughter that helped her move her stuff out of Beverley's house, she paid them each $20

Concerned reader says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:24 PM

This needs to be inverstigated... this women should not go to jail for something she did not do. The judge should over turn this verdict.

Moore says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:22 PM

P.S tried the scam in St. Louis. The same scam that she ran down on Marley. P.S tried the same type of act on former foster parent. Out of state. The woman was face with hell but gained back her good name. Washington State is a lawless system.

Moore says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:17 PM

P.S gave her money to boy friend to date her

Moore says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:15 PM

P.S was living with Marley thru out 2005. I was one of the person that was looking P.S boyfriend that was taking money from P.S( by P.S.) 2005. Marley gave money to P.S and P.S gave her to boys to date her. D and P.S scammed the system more money.

ig says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 9:13 PM

This happen before that her niece lied on her foster mother and other family members in seattle and st louis their is evidence that she stayed their and this is unjustice and the justice will come this. happen to alot of people that kept ddd people.

Joyce says ... on Saturday, Mar 14 at 10:47 AM

Marley is charged with having submitted claims totaling $ 8,765.32 for providing care services for her developmentally delayed recipient niece from July 2005 through December 2006 even though the recipient was not residing with Marley during that per

Waterboard says ... on Friday, Mar 13 at 10:37 PM

This makes no sense at all. Master English or it will master you.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 250 Characters Left

STAR 101.5 KPLZ-FM and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.